OUTCOME (SUMMATIVE) EVALUATION
The major outcome evaluation component focussed on the overall impact of
the Newfoundland Heart Health Program, according to the primary goals of the
NLHHP as noted above:
3.1 Reduction in Mortality, Morbidity, and the Prevalence of Controllable
Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors.
Trends in morbidity, mortality and prevalence of cardiovascular risk
factors were not examined for the following reasons:
- Experience from other programs (such as the North Karelia Project)
suggest that a time frame of 10-15 years is required to observe any
discernable impact of interventions on morbidity and mortality. Furthermore,
the time lag in publication of data did not permit a reasonable review of
trends post the NLHHP.
- Data regarding morbidity are not readily available in this
province, with the exception of information on bed days and length of stay
(which is only available up to 1992-93 at this time). Data on utilization of
hospital outpatient clinics, community health agencies and physician offices
are not accessible at this time.
- A repeat of the Newfoundland Heart Health study has not yet been
carried out in this province. Between November 1988 and 1989, the Newfoundland
Heart Health Survey was carried out by the Community Health Branch of the
Department of Health, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, in
collaboration with the Health Services and Promotion Branch of the Department
of National Health and Welfare. The survey (which consisted of home interview
and clinic visit) was conducted by specially trained community health staff
(Public Health Nurses, Nutritionists and Health Educators). A total of 2412
non-institutionalized residents of Newfoundland (male and female between the
ages of 18 and 74 years) participated in the survey. Participants were
randomly selected from the province's Medical Care Plan File and were
representative of both urban and rural areas.
The survey provided the baseline data on the prevalence and distribution
patterns of cardiovascular disease risk factors, including hypertension,
elevated blood lipids, smoking and obesity in the province. It also assessed
how much residents of the province knew about those factors and their
relationship to heart disease and stroke. A repeat of this survey is
necessary, as it would permit in-depth assessment of changes in heart health
behaviour and knowledge in this province.
3.2 Diffusion of
Intervention Strategies to Address Cardiovascular Risk Factors Throughout the
Community Health System of the Province.
The existing community health system was originally envisioned as the
primary diffusion channel for Heart Health activities in the province and the
project successfully achieved this major goal. In January 1997, the Provincial
Department of Health circulated the standard guidelines for core programming
in the 6 community health regions of the province. The document was a
collaborative endeavour of Provincial and Regional Community Health
Representatives. The impact of the NLHHP was evident throughout the document,
Technical Report Appendix A. The Guiding Principles statement embraced (1) a
population health approach (2) a community development model for working with
communities (3) the creation of healthy public policy (4) intersectoral
cooperation and (5) public education. Four areas of programming were clarified
and objectives established for the year 2000. These areas included: (1)
promotion and support of health and wellbeing (2) promotion of a healthy
environment; (3) prevention and control of communicable diseases; and (4)
provision of health services. Heart Health objectives were stated in all areas
(except communicable diseases). Furthermore, an explicit strategy related to
the "promotion and support of health and wellbeing" outlined the relationship
between the regional community health system and the promotion of heart health
(including linkages with the NLHHP), as described below:
|
STRATEGY: Reduce risk factors for heart
disease by participating in the development and implementation of Newfoundland
and Labrador Heart Health Project activities with an emphasis on
sustainability and diffusion |
| ACTIVITIES |
INDICATORS |
| Provincial | |
| 1. Co-ordinate project activities
throughout the province. |
Evaluation indicators as per the project
evaluation plans. |
| 2. Support a provincial and 6 regional
coalitions to ensure community participation and sustainability. |
|
| 3. Maintain Heart Health initiative on
the agenda of government departments. | |
| Regional | |
| 4.Implement successful project
activities at the community level. |
Participation rates. Number of
activities. |
| 5. Establish and support a coalition to
ensure community participation and sustainability of the heart health
initiative. |
Participation rates. |
| 6. Partner with Institutional Health
Boards in promoting Workplace Health Promotion Programs. |
Number of programs |
|
Source = Community Health Care Programs with Guidelines, p.49
Technical Report, Appendix B contains detailed reports of heart health
activities undertaken in the different community health regions of the
province, 1995-1997. To date, an extensive array of heart health activities
has been generated and diffused across the province. These activities include
(1) lifestyle clinics, (2) Heart-Smart Restaurant Programs (3) media promotion
(4) public information sessions and displays, (5) targeted promotion to women,
the workplace and the schools, (6) participation in health fairs, (7) use and
promotion of tools developed for public education through the NLHHP (such as
The Community Television Kit) and (8) participation in Regional Heart Health
Coalitions.
The regional community health personnel spearheaded the formation of the
Regional Heart Health Coalitions, another major vehicle for sustaining and
diffusing heart health activities across the province. Technical Report,
Appendix C provides details about the extensive activities of these
coalitions.
To date, 7 of the nine original community projects have successfully
sustained aspects of their projects. Furthermore, activities sponsored by the
Public Education and Public Policy Sub-Committees of the Coordinating
Committee are maintaining their profile on the provincial scene. Only one
subcommittee activity encountered substantial problems in successfully
initiating and sustaining a project, the Professional Education Committee.
Factors contributing to variable degrees of success in terms of sustainability
are offered in the discussion of process/implementation which follows.
|